Essay topic:
Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Many people hold a firm view towards a mandatory punishment to all criminals regardless of the different levels of severity. Personally, I believe that under any circumstances should the rationale behind the crime be taken into consideration prior to ultimate judgment.
To begin with, those who advocate the former opinion should have their argument justified. Indeed, they consider that by dint of posing a threat to the society, every offence is suggested to be subject to a consistent execution. For instance, they must serve a certain number of years within the prison or more seriously, they have to carry capital punishment as a result of their crimes. Furthermore, it is claimed that being fully aware of the verdict given by the judges would possibly discourage an individual for committing the offence. As such, this method is a strong deterrent and would engender safety and stability for society.
Nonetheless, I would argue that it is essential that the situation and motivation of criminals be thoroughly deliberated on the grounds that they are intimately linked to the punishment they probably undergo. To demonstrate, self-defense cases, whilst still homicide, are more understandable than the dreadful crimes which requires the murderer planning in advance. A fixed punishment will, however, face harsh criticism from the public for being unfair and inadequate. Accordingly, judges advisedly determinate the verdict based on the facts of the crime in order to guarantee a more humane justice system.
All things considered, I have to reiterate the importance of a flexible punishment rather than a fixed one to those involved in crimes. Only by applying this measure will social impartiality be consolidated.
flaws: No. of
flaws:
No. of Words: 271 350
Sentence Length SD: 5.641 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
No. of Words: 271 350
Sentence Length SD: 5.641 7.5
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 271 350
No. of Characters: 1424 1500
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.255 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.914 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.641 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 271 350
No. of Characters: 1424 1500
No. of Different Words: 171 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.255 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.914 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 113 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 64 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 46 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.846 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.641 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.545 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.05 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5