Essay topic:
The graph below gives information about how much people in the United States and the United Kingdom spend on petrol.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the provided line chart reveals a stark contrast between the United Staes and the United Kingdom in terms of the volume of the petrol each consumed. Apparently, the proportion of disposable income the wealthy in the UK spent on petrol was larger than that of the two classes, while the US showed a completely different trend.
More specifically, the poorest segment of population in the UK spent well under 1% to approximately 3% of their income on petrol. In the middle income class, the figure was considerably higher, ranging from 3% to roughly 4%. In addition, the percentage for the richest reached a peak of 4% and then declined steadily among the weather residents in this category.
Regarding the United Stateds of Ameria, the rates of the poorest and middle-income groups were ahead of that of the UK counterparts. The volume of the poorest ranked first, spending 4% to 5% of their income on petrol, also hitting a high of more than 5%. The next group, the middle income, used a smaller amount of money on the goods, followed by the privileged of the society, ranging from well over 2% to 4%.
Sentence: Apparently, the
Sentence: Apparently, the propotion of disporable income the wealthy in the UK spent on petrol was larger than that of the two classes, while the US showed a completely different trend.
Error: propotion Suggestion: proportion
Error: disporable Suggestion: disposable
Error: propotion Suggestion: proportion
Error: disporable Suggestion: disposable
Sentence: In addition, the percentage for the reichest reached a peak of 4 and then declined steadily among the weathier residents in this category.
Error: weathier Suggestion: weather
Error: reichest Suggestion: richest
Error: weathier Suggestion: weather
Error: reichest Suggestion: richest
flaws:
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 195 200
No. of Characters: 887 1000
No. of Different Words: 110 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.737 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.549 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.442 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.455 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.648 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 195 200
No. of Characters: 887 1000
No. of Different Words: 110 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.737 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.549 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.662 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 68 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24.375 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.442 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.75 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.455 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.648 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4