Essay topic:
W2, some people think governments should introduce laws regrading what nutrition and food choices to improve public health. others think it is wrong. ( i do not remember the exact words but it is something like that) discuss both views and give your own opinion
For the whole world, diverse food is the main choice of every age group. Some people argue that there should be a law of nutrition food to bring healthy lifestyle. While others state that people should have their own choice of food. In this essay, I will contend both views and provide my opinion in support to the later view due to the fact that this law will challenge the democratic rights of people and their way of entertainment.
There is no doubt that government laws to impose nutrition food would bring an advantage of healthy lifestyle, less hospitalise and strong generation. Firstly, people would have less severe disease such as obesity, diabetes and liver problems. For example, recent years have witnessed weight loss programs. The key reason shown, during the introductory series of those heavy contestants, is the unhealthy junk food. Hence if this law is introduced, then at least people will suffer from less disease and obesity problems. Secondly, such lifestyle can have less chances of hospitalise. For example, there are very less chances that healthy people go to hospitals other than injury. This would ultimately save government funds and lead to healthy and fit generation. Consequently, healthy citizen mean healthy nation.
However, this law would challenge the democratic rights of people, their entertainment and spoil many businesses. Firstly, People have the authority to at least eat what they want to. For example, children like junk food items like ice cream and chips, adults usually prefer pizza and burgers; and elder enjoy the food that remind them about their past. Nevertheless, governments rule would interrupt the whole preferred food chain of these generations and realize them the sense of captivity. Secondly, people eat food for enjoyment and entertainment. For example, while watching movie or on beach, people used to eat different food, a mixture of both healthy and unhealthy ingredients.
Consequently, nobody like to follow others recommendations of what they should eat or not. Lastly, most of the big businesses such as McDonalds, Hungry Jack and KFC would have to change their whole list of ingredients according to regulations. There are more chances that pure nutritional meal would give less taste to people than the one that they usually eat today. Consequently, those businesses could fail due to less sale and more expenses.
To recapitulate, although government has the right to think about its people, it would be much better if government monitor the food to include nutritional ingredients and avoid the severe unhealthy ones. In my opinion, people should have the choice of food for enjoyment and entertainment rather to have restrictions on their eating habits.
Full essay evaluations
Sentence: There is no doubt that government laws to impose nutrition food would bring an advantage of healthy lifestyle, less hospitalise and strong generation.
Error: hospitalise Suggestion: hospitalize
Error: hospitalise Suggestion: hospitalize
Sentence: Secondly, such lifestyle can have less chances of hospitalise.
Error: hospitalise Suggestion: hospitalize
Error: hospitalise Suggestion: hospitalize
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 439 350
No. of Characters: 2233 1500
No. of Different Words: 220 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.577 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.087 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.613 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.56 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.452 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.76 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 439 350
No. of Characters: 2233 1500
No. of Different Words: 220 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.577 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.087 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.613 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 151 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 68 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.56 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.452 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.76 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.306 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.487 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5